Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

red flags [2016/09/14 14:19] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== You know you need WorkXpress when... =====
 +If your current processes are not automated, or if they have been previously automated using more basic or older tools, then there is an extremely high likelihood that WorkXpress can very quickly and easily take over management of your process.
 +===== No Automation =====
 +  * No current automation, manual, or paper-intensive processes
  
 +===== Old / Weak Automation =====
 +  * Spreadsheets
 +  * Access or similar databases
 +  * FoxPro
 +  * FileMaker
 +  * Other visual development tools including modern PaaS products that rely on 3GL code environments
 +  * AS/400 based applications (frequently written COBOL, etc.)
 +  * ...and similar
 +
 +===== Expensive New Automation =====
 +Similarly, if you are faced with a large expense developing in 3rd generation languages, WorkXpress may be able to save you significant time, cost and frustration. ​ If you are starting to build in one of the following tools or if a current project is challenged, we strongly recommend you invest just a few minutes to talk to a WorkXpress representative about your project.
 +  * Java
 +  * .Net
 +  * PHP
 +  * ...and similar
 +
 +===== You Need A Working Product Quickly =====
 +If you don't have six months to a year to fight through scope sheets, test products, make changes, and work through all of the typical delays and frustrations that traditional routes provide, then it is worth your time to investigate what WorkXpress has to offer. ​
red flags.txt ยท Last modified: 2016/09/14 14:19 (external edit)
Copyright WorkXpress, 2019